<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Rak7268v2 on Antony Mapfumo</title><link>https://mapfumo.github.io/tags/rak7268v2/</link><description>Recent content in Rak7268v2 on Antony Mapfumo</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2026 13:50:05 +1000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://mapfumo.github.io/tags/rak7268v2/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>From LoRa Modules to Native LoRaWAN the STM32WL Migration - Wk10</title><link>https://mapfumo.github.io/posts/week-10-from-lora-modules-to-native-lorawan-the-stm32wl-migration/</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2026 13:50:05 +1000</pubDate><guid>https://mapfumo.github.io/posts/week-10-from-lora-modules-to-native-lorawan-the-stm32wl-migration/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="the-challenge">The Challenge&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>For the first 9 weeks of this project, I&amp;rsquo;ve been using RYLR998 LoRa modules - simple AT command modules that handled the radio work while my STM32 focused on sensors. They worked beautifully for point-to-point communication (600m range, 95% success rate), but they had a fundamental limitation:&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;strong>They weren&amp;rsquo;t LoRaWAN.&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>LoRa (the physical layer) is great for custom networks. But &lt;strong>LoRaWAN&lt;/strong> (the MAC layer protocol) is what you need for:&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>